Еffect of Social Economic Status and Economic Racionality On Learing Outcome in Hight School

Volume 6, Issue 2, April 2021     |     PP. 62-75      |     PDF (206 K)    |     Pub. Date: April 26, 2021
DOI: 10.54647/education88228    133 Downloads     5124 Views  

Author(s)

Mashudi, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Tanjungpura University, West Kalimantan, Indonesia
Aminiyati, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Tanjungpura University, West Kalimantan, Indonesia
Riama Al Hidayah, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Tanjungpura University, West Kalimantan, Indonesia
Erwin sutandar, Faculty of civil engineering, Tanjungpura University, West Kalimantan, Indonesia

Abstract
The research objective was to analyze the influence of socio-economic status, economic rationality on the learning outcomes of students
The socioeconomic status of the parents of students is very large in determining the learning outcomes of students. The economic rationality of students will affect the acquisition of learning outcomes
The problem is whether there is an effect of socioeconomic status, economic rationality on the learning outcomes of students?.
His theoretical study is Robert E. Slavin (2006: 99) "Socioeconomic status (SES), in terms of an individual's income, occupation, education, and prestige in society". Dan Shahram Heshmat (2011: 77) "Socioeconomic status (SES) has traditionally been defined by education, income, race, and rank (occupational status. And Economic Rationality is Trevor J. Barnes (1996: 84) states" Definition of economic rationality, is that in a world of scarce means, but unlimited desires, individuals must make choices ”.
The research method used descriptive analysis and regression analysis with the variables of socioeconomic status (X1), and economic rationality (X2). The acquisition of learning outcomes (Y). The population is 630 people. With a sample of 227 students.
Results and Discussion of Regression Analysis: Y=71,398+0,544X1+1,761X2
Constant = 71,388. If the socioeconomic status variable (X1) and economic rationality (X2) are equal to 0, then the learning outcomes of Pemangkat State Senior High Education students for the 2020/2021 academic year are 71,388.
Conclusion: The socioeconomic status of the partial correlation is 16.6% with a low level of relationship, the economic rationality of the partial correlation is 48.0% with a moderate level of relationship, and has an effect on the acquisition of learning outcomes. Likewise, the socioeconomic status and economic rationality of the multiple correlation coefficient were 55.1% with a moderate level of relationship, and had an effect on the learning outcomes of 30.2% and the remaining 60.8% was influenced by other factors.

Keywords
socioeconomic status, economic rationality, learning outcomes

Cite this paper
Mashudi, Aminiyati, Riama Al Hidayah, Erwin sutandar, Еffect of Social Economic Status and Economic Racionality On Learing Outcome in Hight School , SCIREA Journal of Education. Volume 6, Issue 2, April 2021 | PP. 62-75. 10.54647/education88228

References

[ 1 ] Abdulsyani. (2012). Sociology of Schematics, Theory and Applied. (Fourth Printing). Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
[ 2 ] Abu Ahmadi. (2007). Basic Social Sciences. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
[ 3 ] Damsar. Indrayani. (2013). Introduction to Economic Sociology. (Second Edition. Third Printing). Jakarta : Kencana.
[ 4 ] Femi Olivia. (2011). Tools For Study Skills. Effective Exam Techniques. Jakarta : PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
[ 5 ] Jean-Paul Chavas. (2014). Risk Analysis In Theory And Practice. United States of America : Academic Press Publications.
[ 6 ] Jerry Kirkpatrick. (2007). In Defense Of Advertising. United States of America : Quorum Books, an imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, CT.
[ 7 ] John W. Santrock. (2007). Teen. (Translation Edition By Shinto B. Adelar; Sherly Saragih). Jakarta : Erlangga.
[ 8 ] M. Dawam Rahardjo. (1993). Perspective of the Declaration of Makkah. Towards Islamic Economics. First Printing. Bandung : Mizan.
[ 9 ] N. Gregory Mankiw. (2012). Economic Principles. Sixth Edition. Canada : Nelson Education, Ltd.
[ 10 ] Robert E. Slavin. (2006). Educational Psychology. Theory And Practice. Eighth Edition. United States of America : Pearson Education.
[ 11 ] Robin. L. Bartlett. (1997). Introducting Race And Gender Into Economics. London : Routledge.
[ 12 ] S.C. Bloch. (2007). Excel For Engineers and Scientists. (Second Edition). Jakarta : Erlangga.
[ 13 ] Shahram Heshmat. (2011). Eating Behavior And Obesity. Behavioral Economics Strategies For Health Professionals. New York : Springer Publishing Company.
[ 14 ] Singgih Santoso. (2019). Parametric Statistics. Concepts and Applications with SPSS. (Revised Edition). Jakarta : PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
[ 15 ] Slameto. (2013). Learning and Influencing Factors. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
[ 16 ] Trevor J. Barnes. (1996). Logics Of Dislocation. Models, Metaphors, and Meanings of Economic Space. New York USA : The Guilford Press.
[ 17 ] Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 20 of 2003. (2011). National Education System. (Fourth printing). Jakarta : Sinar Grafika Offset.
[ 18 ] Law of the Republic of Indonesia No.23 of 2002. Child Protection.
[ 19 ] Aaron. (2013). The Influence of Learning Motivation and Socioeconomic Background of Parents on The Results of Learning IPS Economics Students of SMP Negeri I Lumar Subdistrict Bengkayang. Pontianak : University of Tanjungpura.
[ 20 ] Nur Hixmah Yulihastuti. (2011). Differences in Economic Learning Achievements Reviewed From The Use of E-Learning Media And Student Learning Activities Grade XI IPS Year 2010 / 2011 (Experimental Study at SMA Negeri 2 Pati). Surakarta : University of Eleven March.
[ 21 ] Sadiman. (2010). Contribution of Parental Attention, Self-Concept And Self-Reliance Of Learning To The Achievement of Productive Subjects Students Class XII Automotive Mechanical Engineering Skills Program SMK Sumarno Colomadu Surakarta. Surakarta : University of Eleven March.
[ 22 ] Dede Nurohman. Islamic Economic Rationality. http://dedenurohman. wordpress.com/2009/02/26/rasionalitas-ekonomi-islam/ downloaded on 06/04/2014.
[ 23 ] Herry Priyono. KKN Is Not a Culture. http://www.unisosdem.org/ kumtul_detail.php?aid=85&coid=1&caid=34&auid=3 downloaded on 06/04/2014.
[ 24 ] Saifullah Saifi. Effect of Socioeconomic status on Student Achievement. downloaded on 31/03/2020.
[ 25 ] Suparyanto. Basic Concept of Economic Status. http://dr-suparyanto.blogspot.com/ 2010/07/konsep-dasar-status-ekonomi.html downloaded on March 31, 2020.
[ 26 ] Melman S., Ashby S., James Carole. Supervision in Practice Education and Transition to Practice: Student and New Graduate Perceptions. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice. Volume 14.Number 3. Article 1. July 2016. 1-16
[ 27 ] Ordinance for unified state requirements for the specialties of the professional field "Health care" to a Professional Bachelor degree, State Gazette, 87, 2008.
[ 28 ] Ordinance 1/8.02.2011 for professional activities that nurses, midwives, associated medical specialists and healthcare assistants may perform on prescription or on their own. State Gazette, No 15/18.02.2011.
[ 29 ] Panteva, Ts., Potential of modern medical rehabilitation and ergotherapy. Kinesitherapy and Rehabilitation, 2007, 6, 1-2, 44-51.
[ 30 ] Paskaleva, R., Effect of contemporary elements of the training in kinesitherapy, art therapy and occupational therapy on professional skills of graduating rehabilitation specialists at the Medical College – Stara Zagora, PhD Thesis, 2012, Stara Zagora, 9-37.
[ 31 ] Paskaleva, R., Application of art therapy and occupational therapy in the practical training of students majoring in Rehabilitation at the Medical College – Stara Zagora, Prevention and Rehabilitation, 2011; 5(2): 36-41.
[ 32 ] Paskaleva, R., Co-operation and participation of students majoring in Rehabilitation during the pre-graduation internship. Health Care, 2011; 4: 17- 23.
[ 33 ] Paskaleva, R., The role of the mentor for formation of professional skills of Rehabilitation students during the pre-graduation internship. Nursing , 2012; 1: 23-27.
[ 34 ] Popov, Т. Therapy and prophylaxis with art, Sofia, Education Publishing, 2004.
[ 35 ] Popov, Т. Again about dancing , Sofia, Education Publishing,, 2005.
[ 36 ] Popov, Т. Art therapy in children, Sofia, Defecto Publishing, 2008.
[ 37 ] PHARE programme – Economic and Social Cohesion, Project BG 0202.01, Clearing the path to employment for youths - grant scheme for initiatives for youth employment.
[ 38 ] Stoyanova D. Investigation of the level of academic motivation of students from paedagogical majors. Scientific Works of the University of Rousse, 2009; vol 48, series 6.2; 184-189.
[ 39 ] Turnyova B., Т. Cherkezov. Motivation for training of students majoring in Health Care Management in conditions of continuing education. Management and Education, 2009, vol V, (3), 100-104.
[ 40 ] Williams, K., & Williams, C. (2011). Five key ingredients for improving motivation. Research in Higher Education Journal, 1-23.