Subversion of Grand Narratives and Dictated Rules in “The Very Old Man with Enormous Wings” by Gabriel Garcia Marquez

Volume 7, Issue 6, December 2023     |     PP. 448-469      |     PDF (273 K)    |     Pub. Date: November 6, 2023
DOI: 10.54647/sociology841217    80 Downloads     68562 Views  

Author(s)

Shohreh Haji Mola Hosein, PhD of English Literature, Department of English Language & Literature, Kish International Campus, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
This article explores Gabriel Garcia Marquez’ ‘The very old Man with Enormous Wings’ through the interdisciplinary perspectives of postmodernism and social political ecology and shows how the author undermines grand narratives praising dictated rules. The article underlines the author’s rejection of predestined ideologies that encourage people to colonize the world and the universe and follow anthropocentric speciesism, economic/political powers, cultural/social flaws, and parental hierarchy. The author shakes the pillars of some grand narratives supporting enforced laws of structural centrism while making a critical/satirical narrative. Grand narratives prepare people for dated roles and impose the dictated instructions of political/economic bonds on them. The short story is equipped with postmodern literary motifs of multiplicity, contradiction, replication, undecidability, satirical description, surprising change, metamorphosis, unsteady status of self/the other, parody, and style of magic realism by which the article uncovers the author’s subversion of destructive relations of power. The article uses Jean-Francois Lyotard’s rejection of grand narratives and Val Plumwood’s undermining of platonic and Cartesian theories of anthropocentric speciesism.

Keywords
Anthropocentric Speciesism, Colonization of The World and The Universe, Grand Narrative, Metamorphosis, Multiplicity, Postmodernism, Self/The other Status, Undecidability

Cite this paper
Shohreh Haji Mola Hosein, Subversion of Grand Narratives and Dictated Rules in “The Very Old Man with Enormous Wings” by Gabriel Garcia Marquez , SCIREA Journal of Sociology. Volume 7, Issue 6, December 2023 | PP. 448-469. 10.54647/sociology841217

References

[ 1 ] Clark, J. C. D. “Secularization and Modernization: The Failure of A ‘Grand Narrative’”, The Historical Journal, vol. 55, No. 1, 2013, PP. 161-194. www.jstor.org/stable/41343650.
[ 2 ] Frosch, Marta Morello. “The Common Wonders of Garcia Marquez’s Recent Fiction”. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, vol. 47, no. 3. 1973, PP. 496-501. www.jstor.org/stable/40127324.
[ 3 ] Gymnich, Marion and Alexander Segao Costa. “Of Humans, Pigs, Fish, and Apes: The Literary Motif of Human-Animal Metamorphosis and its Multiple Functions in Contemporary Fiction”. L Esprit Createur, Literature and Ecology vol. 46, no. 2, 2006, PP. 68-88. www.jstor.org/stable/26289224.
[ 4 ] Hammer, Dean. “What The Iliad Knows: Why Lyotard is Wrong about Grand Narrative”. Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, vol. 81, no. ½, 1998, PP. 137-156. www.jstor.org/ stable/ 41178815.
[ 5 ] Kean, John. “The Modern Democratic Revolution: Reflections on Jean-Francois Lyotard’s La Condition Postmoderne”. Chicago Review, vol. 35, no. 4, 1987, PP. 4-19. www.jstor.org/stable/23505375.
[ 6 ] Leo, R. John. “Postmodernity, Narratives, Sexual Politics: Reflections on Jean-Francois Lyotard”. The Central Review, vol. 32, no. 4. PP. 336-50.www.istor.org/stable/23739260.
[ 7 ] Linker Andrew. “Grand Narrative and International Relations”. Global Change, Peace and Security. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, vol. 21, no. 1, 2009, PP. 3-7. Doi: 10.1080/14781150802659234.
[ 8 ] Lyotard, Jean Francois and Niels Brugger. “What about the Postmodern? The Concept of the Postmodern in the Work of Lyotard”. Yale French Studies, Jean-Francois Lyotard: Time and Judgement, 2001, no. 99, PP. 77-92.www.jstor.org/stable/2903244.
[ 9 ] Lyotard, Jean Francois. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1984, PP. 6-15-56.
[ 10 ] Mallory, Chaone. “Val Plumwood and Ecofeminist Political Solidarity”. Ethics and the Environment, vol. 14, no. 2, 2009, PP. 3-19. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/ETE.2009.14.2.3. Accessed 21June 2014.
[ 11 ] ---. “What is Ecofeminist Political Philosophy? Nature, Gender, and the Political”. Environmental Ethics, vol. 26, no.1, 2013, PP. 171-189. doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics201032333
[ 12 ] Marquez, Gabriel Garcia. “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings”. Translated by Gregory Rabassa. Leaf Storm and Other Stories, New Mexico: Santa Fe,1999.
[ 13 ] Mikkonen, Kai. “Theories of Metamorphosis: From Metatrope to Textual Revision”. Style. Rhetoric and Poetics, vol. 30, no.2, 1996, PP. 309-340.
[ 14 ] Myers, Tony. “Lyotard and Lacan Answering the Question: What does Postmodernism Want?”. Edinburgh University Press, vol. 24, no. 1, 2001, PP. 84-98.www.jstor.org/stable/43263622.
[ 15 ] Okuroglu Ozun, Sule and Aydin, Onur. “Rewriting As De-centering of the Master Narratives in J. M. Harris’ The Gospel of Loki”. Arastirma Makalesi, vol. 10, no. 19, 2020, PP. 75-89.Doi: 10.33207/trkede.651775.
[ 16 ] Plumwood, Val. “Environmental Justice”. Institutional Issues Involving Ethics and Justice, vol. 1, no.2, 2009, PP.329-338. www.eolss.net/Eolss-sampleAllChapter.aspx
[ 17 ] ---. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. Routledge, 1993.
[ 18 ] Porter, H. David. “Metamorphoses and Metamorphosis: A Brief Response”. The American Journal of Philosophy, Special Issue: Roman Dining, vol. 124, no. 3, 2003, PP. 473-476.
[ 19 ] Pothier, Jacques. “Voices of the South, Voices from the Souths: Faulkner, Garcia Marquez, Vargas Llosa, Borges”. Hal Open Science, Faulkner Journal, A Latin American Faulkner, vol. 12, no. (1/2), 1996, PP. 1-11. https//shs.hal.science/halshs-00598992.
[ 20 ] Smith, James K. A. “A Little Story About Metanarratives: Lyotard, Religion, and Postmodernism Revisited”, Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers, vol. 18, no. 3, 2001, PP. 353-368. Doi: 10.5840/faithphil200118333.
[ 21 ] Steinbock, Bonnie. “Speciesism and the Idea of Equality”. Philosophy, vol. 53, no. 204, 1978, PP. 247-256. doi.org / 10.1017/S0031819100016582.
[ 22 ] Weinstein, Barbara. “History without a Cause? Grand Narrative, World History, and the Postcolonial Dilemma”. International Review of Social History, vol. 50, no. 1, 2005, PP. 71-93. www.jstor.org/stable/44582873.
[ 23 ] Weisenfeld, Adam and Melanie Joy. “An Overview of Anthropocentrism, Humanism, and Speciesism in Critical Animal Theory”. Defining Critical Animal Studies: An Intersectional Social Justice Approach for Liberation, edited by Sorenson K. Soha and A. Matsuka, Institute Critical Animal Studies, 2014, PP. 1-37.